End-to-end framework predicts ADHD using T1-weighted MRI, suggesting effective anatomical markers.
Predicting attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) from neuroimaging remains challenging due to heterogeneous brain morphology. In this study, we proposed an end-to-end framework using Vision Transformer (ViT) models to directly learn discriminative features from individual-space T1-weighted MRI. We evaluated two anatomical coverage patterns to assess the impact of data reduction and spatial granularity: (1) whole-brain (WB) axial slices and (2) 11 representative slices (R11). Our results demonstrated that the ViT achieved the highest numerical AUC, significantly outperforming the baseline CNN and the conventional ROI-based approach, while performing comparably to ResNet. Notably, the transition from WB to R11 (AUC 0.75) showed no statistically significant degradation in performance ( p = 0 . 19 ), proving that high diagnostic integrity can be maintained even with substantial anatomical data reduction. Interpretability analysis via SHAP, applied to the R11 configuration, identified consistent high-impact spatial clusters across anatomical axes. Specifically, the precentral gyrus and occipital regions emerged as robust neuroanatomical substrates for ADHD classification. These findings suggest that transformer-based self-attention effectively integrates distributed morphological variations across sensorimotor and visual processing networks, providing an anatomically coherent approach to ADHD diagnosis. • We propose an end-to-end framework for ADHD prediction using individual- space T1-weighted MRI. • Vision Transformer (ViT) models directly learn discriminative features from whole-brain and representative slices. • The ViT model significantly outperforms baseline CNNs and conven- tional ROI-based approaches. • SHAP analysis highlights potential structural markers within the motor and sensory networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maeda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: