Examines barriers to international research funding in Libya, highlighting systemic constraints and the need for support.
International research funding is critical to scientific progress; yet, access remains uneven and highly competitive, particularly in underrepresented regions. This study examines barriers to securing international funding among Libyan researchers, with attention to career stage, disciplinary background, and institutional context. A quantitative cross-sectional survey of 117 researchers was undertaken using a validated questionnaire and analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics to assess application patterns and perceived obstacles. Results indicate a marked inverse relationship between research experience and application frequency, with early-career researchers submitting the most applications but securing comparatively fewer awards. No significant association was detected between specialization and application activity (P > .05), although medical sciences and engineering reported greater participation and success. Key barriers included limited infrastructure, insufficient training, and restricted international collaboration. Participation was largely confined to public universities. Findings underscore systemic constraints and highlight a need for capacity building, mentorship, and more inclusive funding mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdulsamad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: