PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026European Heart Journal13 citations

Remote ischaemic pre-conditioning, kidney injury, and outcomes after coronary angiography and intervention: a randomized trial

View Full Paper
PJPing JiaGZGang ZhaoYHYuli Huang

Key Result

Delayed remote ischaemic pre-conditioning lowered the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury compared with sham in at-risk patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI.

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate if delayed remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in patients undergoing coronary angiography or intervention.
  • Multicentre, randomized trial of 501 patients at risk for acute kidney injury undergoing elective coronary angiography or intervention.
  • Patients received either delayed remote ischaemic preconditioning or sham treatment 24 hours before the procedure.
  • Primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury defined by specific criteria.
  • The incidence of acute kidney injury was 7.6% in the sham group and 3.2% in the delayed remote ischaemic preconditioning group (odds ratio 0.4, 95% CI 0.17-0.94; P = 0.03).
  • 93.2% of participants completed outcome assessments at 90 days.
  • The study was not adequately powered for secondary outcomes, which included renal replacement therapy and cardiovascular events.

Structured PICO

Does delayed remote ischaemic pre-conditioning reduce the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in at-risk patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI?

P
Population
At-risk patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
I
Intervention
Delayed remote ischaemic pre-conditioning (RIPC)
C
Comparator
Sham RIPC
O
Outcome
Incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI)surrogate

Delayed remote ischaemic pre-conditioning may reduce the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in at-risk patients undergoing coronary angiography or intervention.

Limitations

  • Requires confirmation in larger trials to investigate clinical benefits

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remote ischaemic pre-conditioning (RIPC) delivered shortly prior to an angiographic procedure may reduce contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). Whether a longer interval between RIPC and contrast administration also reduces CA-AKI and post-procedural complications after coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomized trial of patients at risk of CA-AKI undergoing elective CAG or PCI comparing delayed RIPC (four cycles of 5 min inflations on one upper arm 24 h before the procedure) with sham RIPC. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI, defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Secondary endpoints included renal replacement therapy during hospitalization, changes in urinary biomarkers of kidney injury, and occurrence of non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, re-hospitalization, and all-cause mortality by day 90. RESULTS: Altogether, 501 patients (age, 74 66, 78 years) were randomly assigned to delayed (n = 250) or sham (n = 251) RIPC, of which 467 (93.2%) completed outcome assessments at day 90. The incidence of CA-AKI was 7.6% with sham and 3.2% with delayed RIPC (odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.94; P = .03). The trial was not adequately powered to show effects on secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among at-risk patients undergoing CAG or PCI, the incidence of CA-AKI was lower in patients receiving delayed compared with sham RIPC. These results should be confirmed in larger trials to investigate whether reductions in CA-AKI with delayed RIPC lead to important clinical benefits.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jia et al. (2025) studied this question. Delayed remote ischaemic pre-conditioning lowered the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury compared with sham in at-risk patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e8928ede19b3b6442c1d96https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf135
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper