Why the study?
Does AAV8-mediated LDLR gene therapy safely reduce cholesterol in a mouse model of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia?
Does AAV8-mediated LDLR gene therapy safely reduce cholesterol in a mouse model of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia?
AAV8-mediated LDLR gene therapy demonstrated a wide therapeutic window (≥80-fold) with no dose-limiting toxicities up to 6.0 × 10^13 GC/kg in a mouse model of HoFH, supporting progression to Phase 1 clinical trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wide therapeutic window in HoFH mouse model; leaves open translation to human AAV8-LDLR trials.
The homozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an excellent model for developing in vivo gene therapy in humans. The success of orthotropic liver transplantation in correcting the metabolic abnormalities in HoFH suggests that the correction of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) expression in hepatocytes via gene therapy should be sufficient for therapeutic efficacy. Vectors based on adeno-associated virus serotype 8 (AAV8) have been previously developed for liver-targeted gene therapy of a number of genetic diseases, including HoFH. In preparation for initiating a Phase 1 clinical trial of AAV8-mediated LDLR gene therapy for HoFH, a combined pharmacology/toxicology study was conducted in a mouse model of HoFH. No dose-limiting toxicities were found at or below 6.0 × 10¹³ GC/kg. Therefore, the maximally tolerated dose is greater than the highest dose that was tested. Mild and transient liver pathology was noted at the highest dose. Therefore, the no effect dose was greater than or equal to the middle dose of 7.5 × 10¹² GC/kg. The minimally effective dose was determined to be ≤7.5 × 10¹¹ GC/kg, based on stable reductions in cholesterol that were considered to be clinically significant. This translates to a therapeutic window of ≥80-fold for the treatment of HoFH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greig et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: