This analysis compares plaque burden assessment methods, revealing high agreement in interrater assessments of coronary health.
The methods for coronary plaque burden assessment allowed in CAD-RADS 2.0 show moderate to substantial agreement. . Interrater agreement for the segment involvement score (SIS) and visual plaque estimate is high. Overall CAD-RADS 2.0 categories show a high degree of interrater agreement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Platzek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: