Retrospective validation study evaluates claims-based UTI identification accuracy in long-term care patients, highlighting its potential for epidemiological research.
Claims data can be a resource for epidemiological evaluations in long-term care patients at increased risk of urinary tract infections (UTI) from antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. However, as claims data are primarily collected for administrative purposes, validating diagnostic accuracy is required. This study evaluated the validity of claims-based UTI identification in this patient population. This retrospective study included patients in long-term care wards between January 2023 and December 2024. Using diagnoses from electronic medical records as the gold standard, we evaluated the positive predictive value (PPV) of claims-based identification of UTI and catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI). Diagnoses were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes or urinalysis with microscopy, urine culture, antibiotic prescriptions, or indwelling bladder catheter procedures. Sensitivity analysis excluding suspected diagnoses was performed. Among 523 patients, 200 with at least one ICD-10 code for UTI were randomly selected. The PPV for identifying UTI using ICD-10 codes improved from 66.0 to 77.8% when additional codes were combined, and that for CAUTI improved from 45.5 to 86.8% with indwelling bladder catheter procedures. Excluding suspected diagnoses further improved the accuracy. Integrating ICD-10 codes, urinalysis with microscopy, urine culture, antibiotic prescriptions, and, when relevant, indwelling bladder catheter procedures while excluding suspected diagnoses enhances the validity of claims-based UTI identification and may be applicable to database studies using claims data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumagai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: