This research explores the antimicrobial activity of proline-rich peptides in Klebsiella pneumoniae, indicating potential treatment strategies.
The rapid emergence of antibiotic resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae is a pressing concern, largely attributed to its rapid development of antibiotic resistance. Our previous work demonstrated that Bac7 (1-35), a proline-rich antimicrobial peptide (PrAMP), displayed potent antimicrobial activity toward K. pneumoniae and aggregated with cell-associated polysaccharides produced by this species. Here, we investigated natural PrAMPs from diverse organisms to explore their antimicrobial activity and interactions with K. pneumoniae cell-associated polysaccharides. The PrAMPs apidaecin Cd3+, Tur1A, and PR-39 demonstrated activity against all tested strains, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ≤ 1 μmol L⁻¹, while only Tur1A and PR-39 had biofilm disruption potential. These active PrAMPs shared common structural features, including a proline content above 36% and a net positive charge exceeding +5. Interestingly, both active and inactive PrAMPs aggregated with cell-associated polysaccharides, indicating that the antimicrobial activity and cell-associated polysaccharide aggregation potential are distinct features of PrAMPs. PrAMPs with SbmA transporter-independent activity did not lyse the membrane but caused membrane depolarization, where increased depolarization was observed with colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae. Bacterial mutants lacking LPS modifications conferring colistin resistance displayed rapid uptake of BODIPY-labeled PR-39 and Bac7 (1-35), whereas mutants lacking the SbmA transporter displayed less uptake of PR-39 than Bac7 (1-35). Overall, these findings highlight peptide charge as a critical determinant of membrane interaction and membrane-mediated uptake while also revealing mechanistic insight into how PrAMPs engage with oligosaccharides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Appiah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: