PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026The Horticulture Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Monitoring Relative Grape Berry Growth in the Field with YOLOv8 and Biology-informed Smoothing

JLJixiao LiTSTeruo SoneXMXiangji Meng

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a method for non-destructive monitoring of grape berry growth using a biology-informed approach.
  • Implemented a YOLOv8 model for object detection in grape clusters.
  • Incorporated a monotonicity-constrained smoothing step to enhance tracking of growth trends.
  • Conducted validations using field and laboratory data to compare image-derived measurements with manual caliper data.
  • The YOLOv8 model achieved high identification accuracy with mAP50 = 0.931.
  • Image-derived measurements closely matched manual readings with mean absolute error of 0.08 cm.
  • Biologically credible growth trajectories were obtained, highlighting significant timing features for viticulture.

Abstract

Uncontrolled lighting, occlusion, and variations in viewing angles make it difficult to perform high-frequency, non-destructive monitoring of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berry growth in the field. Instead of tracking absolute millimeter-level size, a biology-informed pipeline based on YOLOv8 to track relative growth trends is presented. A biology-informed, monotonicity-constrained smoothing step (F-smoothed) is integrated into a workflow that also includes object detection, pixel-to-centimeter conversion using an in-frame 1-cm ruler, preliminary smoothing (outlier removal, interpolation, moving average), and double-sigmoid fitting to summarize phase timing. Images of the ‘Kerner’ and ‘Zweigelt’ clusters in Yoichi, Hokkaido (2024 season; 10 clusters; 1–3-day intervals) were examined as a field case study. On a hold-out validation set, the trained YOLOv8s model demonstrated stable identification (mAP50 = 0.931; mAP50–95 = 0.704; Precision = 0.906; Recall = 0.875). In an independent laboratory validation using detached berries from the 2025 season imaged on a white background, image-derived diameters closely agreed with manual caliper measurements over a range of approximately 0.3–2.3 cm (n = 89; mean absolute error = 0.08 cm; root mean square error = 0.09 cm; mean absolute percentage error = 7.2%; bias = +0.07 cm; R2 = 0.97). Biologically credible trajectories were obtained by applying F-smoothed, averaged cultivar curves followed a double-sigmoid pattern with clear timing features. Such relative temporal indicators are directly relevant for viticultural decisions such as scheduling field inspections and harvest windows and for designing sampling strategies for berry composition and quality. Although destructive sampling of the 2024 field clusters was not undertaken, the combination of a validated measurement module and biology-informed smoothing provides reliable phase timing and relative trend tracking in real-world scenarios. With only a handheld camera and conventional computing, this approach offers a practical methodology for non-destructive growth monitoring that emphasizes temporal dynamics while retaining interpretable links to physical berry size.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b71b85696592c86eb332https://doi.org/10.2503/hortj.szd-110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper