Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized controlled trial evaluates safety and effectiveness of proximal hypoglossal nerve stimulation in adults with obstructive sleep apnea, indicating a new treatment option.
BACKGROUND: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is used to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however, evidence is limited for patients who cannot tolerate positive airway pressure therapy. Proximal HGNS (pHGNS) provides multicontact stimulation of proximal nerve portions, with easier electrode implantation than distal nerve stimulation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pHGNS in patients with moderate-to-severe OSA. DESIGN: 7-month randomized controlled trial followed by a 6-month open-label extension. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04950894). SETTING: 23 U.S. health centers. PATIENTS: Adults aged 22 years or older with moderate-to-severe OSA. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent implantation with pHGNS at baseline and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to treatment or control. Therapy began at month 1 (treatment) or month 7 (control). MEASUREMENTS: Assessments included the proportion of patients achieving greater than 50% improvement from baseline in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and AHI below 20 events/h at month 7 (primary end point), improvements in oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and patient-reported outcomes (for example, Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]), and safety. RESULTS: The 104 randomly assigned patients had a mean age of 55.6 years (SD, 9.0), body mass index of 30.6 kg/m LIMITATIONS: Lack of blinding, small sample size, and short follow-up. CONCLUSION: pHGNS for OSA yielded clinically significant responses versus control at month 7, supporting pHGNS as a therapeutic option for OSA. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: LivaNova PLC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malhotra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: