PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Agricultural Environment and Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Side-depth fertilization modified rice growth strategy to enhance grain yield by optimizing soil nutrient conditions

View Full Paper
KHKun HouPLPing LiuRXRusheng Xiao

Key Points

  • To examine the effects of side-depth fertilization on rice growth strategies and nutrient dynamics.
  • Implemented four treatments: no fertilization, surface fertilization, 5-cm side-deep application, and 10-cm side-deep application.
  • Measured spatial distribution of soil nutrients and rice roots, photosynthetic traits, and yield across treatments.
  • Compared the effects on root depth, biomass, and nutrient recovery efficiency.
  • SDF significantly enhanced soil nitrogen and phosphorus levels while reducing deep root distribution.
  • Observed increases in tillering and net photosynthetic rates under SDF, leading to greater biomass and yields.
  • SDF improved nitrogen and phosphorus recovery efficiency significantly compared to surface fertilization.

Abstract

Side-depth fertilization (SDF) is a critical strategy to boost fertilizer use efficiency and crop production. Yet, the growth strategies of rice in response to soil nutrient changes brought by SDF have been rarely reported. To enrich the rice SDF technology, this study set up four treatments: no fertilization (CK), surface fertilization (D0), 5-cm side-deep application (D5), and 10-cm side-deep application (D10). The study compared the spatial distribution characteristics of fertilizer nutrients and rice roots in the soil, as well as photosynthetic and growth traits, yield, and fertilizer use efficiency across different treatments. The results indicated that, in comparison to D0, SDF significantly altered the distribution of soil nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), enhancing their levels within the tillage layer. For root systems, SDF somewhat reduced the distribution of deep roots, with root weight and root-shoot ratio decreasing by 0.2% ∼ 28.2% and 5.0% ∼ 15.9%, respectively. For the canopy, SDF increased tillering by 8.42% ∼ 25.6%, net photosynthetic rate by 0.18% ∼ 16.86%. Strategic adjustments to the root systems and canopy under SDF treatment promote the accumulation of dry matter and the formation of yield in rice. Compared with D0, SDF increased the biomass by 10.6% ∼ 36.3%, and yields by 5.77% ∼ 21.35%. Additionally, it enhanced N recovery efficiency (NRE) by 20.0% ∼ 36.7% and P recovery efficiency (PRE) by 0.01% ∼ 22.0%. However, there was no significant difference in above-ground biomass, NRE, and PRE between the D10 and D5. But, compared with D5, D10 exhibited stronger nutrient retention, accompanied by lower root distribution in deeper soil layers and greater potential for fertilizer reduction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b77885696592c86eb3cahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ages.2026.100018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper