Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, reflecting a persistent gap between clinical phenotyping and the molecular mechanisms that govern disease initiation, progression, and inter-individual variability. Recent advances in emerging technologies have fundamentally reshaped cardiovascular physiology by enabling high-resolution, cross-layer profiling of the heart and vasculature across genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, lipidomic, glycomic, and fluxomic layers, increasingly at single-cell and spatial resolution. These approaches reveal CVD as a coordinated, multi-layered process driven by dynamic interactions among cell types, regulatory programs, and metabolic states, rather than isolated gene-level defects. In this review, we synthesize how emerging multi-omic, computational, and functional genomics technologies are redefining the study of cardiovascular disease across molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. We highlight recent innovations in single-cell and spatial atlases, long-read sequencing, proteomics and metabolomics, integrative data modeling, and functional omics approaches, including genome-scale perturbation screens and single-cell perturbation frameworks. These platforms enable mechanistic dissection of regulatory circuits, distinguish primary disease drivers from secondary adaptations, and directly assess therapeutic reversibility, advancing the field beyond associative biomarker discovery toward mechanism-guided target prioritization. We further discuss key methodological and translational challenges accompanying high-dimensional cardiovascular data, including pre-analytical variability, control selection, temporal misalignment across molecular layers, population diversity and reference bias. By integrating technological innovation with computational rigor and functional validation, this review frames emerging omics-enabled strategies as a unified, physiologically grounded framework for translating molecular insight into clinically meaningful cardiovascular phenotypes and advancing precision cardiovascular medicine.
Zehra et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: