This protocol audits interpretational behavior in large language models, highlighting evaluation procedures to ensure methodological validity.
This record presents a condensed English version of Alemetria, a protocol for auditing interpretational behavior in large language models (LLMs). Alemetria shifts evaluation from direct output comparison to validation of the conditions under which comparison is methodologically permissible. The protocol is organized as a structured sequence (B0-B4) and introduces a rule prohibiting calculation when interpretational comparability or stability conditions are not satisfied. The method distinguishes between substantive agreement, false consensus, divergence, evasion, interpretational suppression, and instability under reformulation. This condensed version focuses on the formal logic of the protocol. For the full methodological specification, extended empirical data, case studies, and appendices, see the Russian preprint:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19674164
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. V. Blinkova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: