Key result
Rivaroxaban shows similar mortality to apixaban but is linked to ~350% higher intraventricular hemorrhage rates.
Why the study?
Evidence comparing different non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants regarding intracranial hemorrhage characteristics and clinical outcomes is limited.
Does the type of NOAC or the administration of 4F-PCC affect in-hospital mortality and hemorrhage characteristics in geriatric patients presenting with intracranial hemorrhage?
Observational (n=47)
Yes
Does the type of NOAC or the administration of 4F-PCC affect in-hospital mortality and hemorrhage characteristics in geriatric patients presenting with intracranial hemorrhage?
In geriatric patients with NOAC-associated intracranial hemorrhage, rivaroxaban use was associated with a higher rate of intraventricular hemorrhage compared to apixaban, though overall in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ by NOAC type.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change NOAC selection in geriatric ICH; leaves open optimal agent pending randomized trials.
Evidence comparing different non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in terms of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) characteristics and clinical outcomes is limited. This study aimed to identify factors associated with mortality and morbidity in geriatric patients receiving different NOACs presenting to the emergency department with intracranial hemorrhage. This multicenter retrospective observational study. Geriatric patients (aged ≥ 65 years) who presented to the emergency department with ICH while receiving NOAC therapy were included. Clinical characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included hemorrhage volume, intraventricular hemorrhage, intensive care unit admission, and the effect of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate administration. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U or t-test for continuous variables, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 47 patients were included; 57.4% (n = 27) were female and 42.6% (n = 20) were male. No significant association was observed between NOAC type and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.533). Intraventricular hemorrhage was significantly more frequent in the rivaroxaban group than in the apixaban group (42.9% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.014). Intraventricular hemorrhage (52.6% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (90.5% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.012) were significantly more common in the mortality group compared with the survival group. NOAC type was not associated with in-hospital mortality; however, intraventricular hemorrhage occurred more frequently in patients receiving rivaroxaban and was significantly associated with mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Güven et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Intracranial hemorrhage under NOAC treatment (n=47). Rivaroxaban vs. Apixaban was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.533). Rivaroxaban and apixaban showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (47.6% vs 38.1%), but rivaroxaban was associated with a higher rate of intraventricular hemorrhage (42.9% vs 9.5%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: