Technical note demonstrates effective management of coronary vessel perforations using a novel single-access technique, implying procedural simplification.
Background/Objectives: Coronary perforations are infrequent but potentially fatal complications during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Interventional management aims to stop extravasation and restore distal flow to prevent tamponade and cardiogenic shock. In current practice, the ping-pong technique is recommended to ensure sealing of the perforation during covered stent delivery. However, this method is complex, time-consuming, and requires a second vascular access. Therefore, we developed a technique that seals the perforation and enables covered stent implantation using a single guide catheter. Methods: This technical note describes a novel technique in which a guide extension catheter (GEC) can be advanced across a vascular perforation after balloon inflation. The insertion of the GEC is made possible by detachment of the balloon hypotube. To minimize leakage, a regular coronary wire introducer needle is attached to the snapped hypotube after GEC loading and continuously inflated to hold nominal pressure. Advancement of the GEC across the perforation immediately limits hemorrhage and facilitates covered stent deployment via a single vascular access. The technique was first evaluated in bench testing and subsequently applied in three illustrative clinical cases at a tertiary referral center using standard, commercially available devices. Results: Bench testing confirmed the reproducibility of the ripping maneuver and successful ballon inflation over enough time to advance the GEC with the introducer married with the ripped hypotube. In all clinical cases, the GEC was successfully advanced across the perforation, allowing prompt covered stent deployment where necessary using a single guide catheter and access site without technical failure. Conclusions: The RIP (Rip and Inflate in Perforations)—technique is a feasible and reproducible alternative to the ping-pong technique. Bench validation and initial clinical application suggest that it may simplify the management of large-vessel perforations while reducing procedural complexity and the need for additional vascular access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Will et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: