Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows connections between attitudes toward transitional justice and well-being in Taiwan, indicating broader implications.
Political violence caused by war, armed conflicts, or state violence against its own people is a major determinant of health. Transitional justice is both a value and a set of practices aimed at preventing the recurrence of state political violence. This study proposes a revised conceptual framework that establishes the relationship between people's attitudes toward transitional justice practices and their physical health, happiness, and sense of solidarity in self-defense amid geopolitical tensions. The study uses Taiwan as an illustrative case of transitional justice in a post-authoritarian democracy with historical state political violence and under threats of external political violence. The analysis is based on data from a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey conducted in 2020, with a final sample size of 1048 participants. The study found positive associations between different dimensions of attitudes toward transitional justice and respondents' well-being and willingness to defend themselves. The findings suggest that recognition of the state's unjust political violence and reconciliation among social members may be related to people's well-being. Furthermore, transitional justice should be seen not only as a domestic issue but also as one with significant geopolitical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: