PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Environmental and Sustainability Indicators0 citationsOpen Access

A Pathway to Sustainable Development in the GCC: Empirical Evidence on How Renewable Energy and Structural Change Mitigate Natural Capital's Environmental Effects

View Full Paper
HDHamrouni DaghbagiKZKahouli ZohraDDDRIDI Dhouha

Key Points

  • The study investigates how renewable energy and structural changes can mitigate CO2 emissions driven by natural capital in the GCC region.
  • Utilized panel data from GCC countries covering 2003-2021.
  • Employed PMG-ARDL approach along with FMOLS and DOLS for robustness testing.
  • Analyzed impacts of GDP, natural capital, renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and urban population on CO2 emissions.
  • A 1% increase in renewable energy leads to a 2.25% decrease in CO2 emissions.
  • A 1% increase in structural change reduces CO2 emissions by 0.168%.
  • Natural capital increases emissions by 0.28%, while renewable energy and structural change mitigate its emissions intensity.

Abstract

The GCC region has long relied on its abundant natural capital for development, but this dependence has driven significant CO 2 emissions at a high environmental cost. In response, GCC countries are actively diversifying their economies by shifting from oil and gas dependence toward renewable energy and service sector growth. Using panel data and the PMG-ARDL approach for GCC countries (2003–2021), this study examines the long- and short-run impacts of GDP, natural capital, renewable energy, non-renewable energy, structural change, and urban population on CO 2 emissions, specifically testing whether renewable energy and structural change can mitigate the detrimental effects of natural capital. FMOLS and DOLS methods test the robustness of long-run results. Our findings reveal that in the long run, GDP, non-renewable energy, natural capital, and urban population increase emissions, while renewable energy and structural change reduce them. A 1% increase in renewable energy reduces CO 2 emissions by 2.25% and a 1% increase in structural change reduces them by 0.168%, whereas a 1% increase in natural capital raises emissions by 0.28%. Moreover, renewable energy reduces natural capital's emissions intensity by 0.61% and structural change reduces it by 0.04%, confirming that both factors successfully mitigate the positive effect of natural capital on emissions. We conclude that accelerating the transition towards a diversified green economy is not merely an economic imperative for the GCC but an environmental necessity. These findings offer a clear policy pathway, underscoring the dual benefits of renewable energy investment and structural reform for achieving sustainable development in the region. • In GCC, GDP, natural capital, and non-renewable energy raise CO2 emissions. • Renewable energy and structural change reduce CO2 emissions. • Renewable energy and structural change reduce emissions from natural capital • The long-term PMG-ARDL results are robust to FMOLS and DOLS estimators. • GCC policies must pivot to promoting structural change and renewable energy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Daghbagi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b89b85696592c86ebbe1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2026.101273
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper