PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences0 citations

Distinct system-level computations underlie perceptual variation across the visual field

View Full Paper
SXShutian XueNew York UniversityABAntoine BarbotNew York UniversityJAJared AbramsThe University of Texas at Austin

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how different computations within the visual system affect perception across various eccentricities and polar angles.
  • Utilized the equivalent noise method and perceptual template model for orientation discrimination tasks.
  • Estimated gain, internal noise, and nonlinearity across different visual field regions (fovea, parafovea, perifovea).
  • Analyzed variations in visual performance based on eccentricity and polar angle.
  • Visual performance decreased with eccentricity due to lower gain and increased internal noise.
  • Gain varied with polar angle, being higher along the horizontal than vertical meridian.
  • Participants with stronger eccentricity effects exhibited a greater decrease in gain.

Abstract

Human visual perception for basic dimensions varies with eccentricity and polar angle, influencing daily activities such as reading, searching, and scene perception. We investigated whether and how system-level computations that transform visual input into perception underlie these heterogeneities. Using the equivalent noise method and perceptual template model, we estimated gain, internal noise, and nonlinearity for orientation discrimination across eccentricity (fovea, parafovea, and perifovea) and around polar angle. Participants discriminated the orientation of Gabors embedded in dynamic white noise and showed the expected variations across eccentricity and around polar angle. Importantly, visual performance declined with eccentricity due to decreased gain and nonlinearity and increased internal noise. Observers with stronger eccentricity effects showed greater gain decrease. Only gain varied with polar angle—higher along the horizontal than vertical meridian, and higher at the lower than the upper vertical meridian—paralleling performance asymmetries. This dissociation aligns with known variations in neuronal count and tuning. By revealing distinct system-level computations underlying the eccentricity effect and polar angle asymmetries, our findings link perceptual heterogeneity across the visual field and neural architecture and provide insights into how the human brain encodes information under neural constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b8d485696592c86ebe1chttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2533752123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1System-Level Computations Underlie Visual Field Heterogeneity2025
  2. 2Signal-to-Noise Efficiency Explains Inter-Observer Variability in Orientation Discrimination2026
  3. 3Foveated metamers of the early visual system2025
  4. 4Consistent metacognitive efficiency and variable response biases in peripheral vision2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5How distinct sources of nuisance variability in natural images and scenes limit human stereopsis2024 · 1 citations