PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Exploration of neuroscience2 citationsOpen Access

Microbiota–mitochondria crosstalk in the gut–brain axis: a missing link in the etiology and treatment of major depressive disorder

OAOluwagbenga Mayowa AduAfe Babalola UniversityCCChinonso Anita ChukwuAfe Babalola UniversityOOOluwafunmbi Ebenezer Ogunmiluyi

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize evidence on the role of microbiota and mitochondria interactions in major depressive disorder.
  • Critically review current literature on microbiota–mitochondria crosstalk in relation to major depressive disorder.
  • Examine psychobiotic trials, metabolomic studies, and mechanisms involving microglia and mitochondria.
  • Microbial metabolites, particularly short-chain fatty acids, influence key mitochondrial functions.
  • Evidence from human studies remains inconsistent and largely correlational rather than causal.
  • The microbiota–mitochondria interaction presents a plausible framework for new therapeutic strategies in major depressive disorder.

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is increasingly understood as a multifactorial psychiatric disorder involving interacting neural, immune, metabolic, and microbial processes. Within this framework, the microbiota–gut–brain axis and mitochondrial bioenergetics have emerged as potentially intersecting contributors to depressive symptomatology. Preclinical studies suggest that microbial metabolites—especially short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)—can influence oxidative phosphorylation, redox balance, neuroinflammation, and synaptic plasticity, whereas inflammatory signals such as lipopolysaccharide may disrupt mitochondrial dynamics. However, the strength of evidence is uneven: mechanistic support is strongest in cell and animal models, whereas human data remain heterogeneous and largely associative. This narrative review critically synthesizes current evidence on microbiota–mitochondria crosstalk in MDD, distinguishing established findings from emerging hypotheses. It also examines recent psychobiotic trials, metabolomic and biomarker studies, and microglia–mitochondria mechanisms, and discusses the translational limitations that currently constrain clinical application. Overall, this axis represents a plausible and clinically relevant framework for hypothesis generation and adjunctive intervention development, but it should not yet be regarded as a fully validated causal pathway or stand-alone therapeutic target in MDD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b91385696592c86ebf2fhttps://doi.org/10.37349/en.2026.1006133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Lipid metabolic dysregulation-induced neuroinflammation in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder2025 · 25 citations
  2. 2Short-Chain Fatty Acid (SCFA) as a Connecting Link between Microbiota and Gut-Lung Axis─A Potential Therapeutic Intervention to Improve Lung Health2024 · 98 citations
  3. 3Structure of the Blood Brain Barrier and its Role in the Transporters for the Movement of Substrates across the Barriers2023 · 55 citations
  4. 4NMDARs antagonist MK801 suppresses LPS-induced apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction by regulating subunits of NMDARs via the CaM/CaMKII/ERK pathway2023 · 21 citations
  5. 5Mitochondria: It is all about energy2023 · 294 citations