Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study finds rapid testing improves mortality and treatment in critically ill patients with infections.
Background Early administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is crucial for survival in critically ill patients with Gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNB BSIs). Rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) can provide faster susceptibility results, enabling timely optimization of therapy. This study evaluates the real-world clinical impact of RAST versus conventional AST in improving early antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcomes in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting with a high burden of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Methods We conducted a retrospective, observational study in the ICU of ‘Renato Dulbecco’ University Hospital (Catanzaro, Italy) from April 1st to September 30th, 2025. Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) with monomicrobial GNB BSIs were included and divided into two groups based on the susceptibility testing strategy used: RAST or conventional AST. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included administration of early active antimicrobial therapy (i.e., administration of at least one active agent in vitro within 24 h of blood culture sampling), clinical failure, length of both ICU and total hospital stay. Results A total of 133 patients were included (RAST: 37; AST: 96). Thirty-day mortality was observed in 4/37 patients (10.8%) in the RAST group and in 30/96 (31.3%) in the AST group (P= 0.015). Early active therapy was administered to 32/37 (86.5%) RAST patients versus 44/96 (45.8%) in the AST group (P< 0.001). Clinical failure occurred in 0/37 RAST patients versus 20/96 (20.8%) AST patients (P= 0.003). Mean ICU stay was 30.3 ± 22.9 days (RAST) versus 36.9 ± 25.6 days (AST), P= 0.17. At Cox regression analysis, RAST-guided management (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.62) and early active therapy (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.19–0.94) were independently associated with survival (Figure 1). Conclusions RAST significantly increased the likelihood of early active therapy and was associated with reductions in both 30-day mortality and clinical failure in critically ill patients with GNB BSIs. These findings suggest that RAST may represent a valuable tool to optimize antimicrobial therapy in ICU settings, particularly in light of the increasing prevalence of MDR GNB.Figure 1.Cox regression analysis of factors associated with clinical failure in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNB BSIs). Early active in vitro therapy was defined as the administration of at least one active agent in vitro within 24 h of blood culture sampling. RAST, rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rotundo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: