PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Buildings0 citationsOpen Access

Multi-Objective Optimization of Green Construction Using an Engineering-Oriented Genetic Algorithm: Coordinated Trade-Offs Among Duration, Cost, and Carbon Emissions

View Full Paper
BLBin LvHGHongyan GuKQKai Qiu

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop an optimization model for construction that balances duration, cost, and carbon emissions under feasibility constraints.
  • Developed a multi-objective optimization model incorporating quality thresholds and feasibility conditions.
  • Utilized an engineering-oriented genetic algorithm for generating Pareto solutions.
  • Compared the new genetic algorithm with conventional optimization methods through extensive evaluations.
  • Achieved the highest mean hypervolume of 0.723, indicating optimal Pareto front solutions.
  • Demonstrated the lowest mean spacing of 0.076, representing improved solution diversity.
  • Identified trade-offs in construction where concrete activities heavily influenced cost and emissions.

Abstract

To address insufficient carbon integration, weakly verifiable quality constraints, and unstable Pareto-set generation in construction-stage green decision-making, this study develops a multi-objective optimization model for construction mode configuration and an engineering-oriented genetic algorithm (GA) framework for Pareto solution generation under hard feasibility constraints. In a construction organization scenario, duration, cost, and carbon emissions are formulated as parallel objectives, while a quality threshold, explicit process logic, and basic resource and workface-feasibility conditions are incorporated to ensure engineering implementability. Construction-stage carbon emissions are quantified using the emission factor method under an auditable activity-level accounting framework. The configured GA framework is compared with the conventional GA, the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II, and the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III through repeated-run statistics and multi-metric evaluation. On the main case, it achieves the highest mean hypervolume (0.723 ± 0.074, mean ± standard deviation), the lowest mean spacing (0.076 ± 0.207), and the smallest average convergence generation (18.49 ± 2.57). The Pareto results reveal a clear trade-off among duration, cost, and carbon emissions, in which high-load beam-and-slab formwork and concrete-related activities dominate cost and carbon variation, whereas schedule advantage mainly depends on stronger compression of critical-chain activities and inter-floor handover.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lv et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9ba2a85696592c86ec747https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081635
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Study on Multi-Objective Optimization of Construction Project Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Multi-Objective Optimization in Construction Project Management Based on NSGA-III: Pareto Front Development and Decision-Making2024 · 36 citations
  3. 3A multiobjective optimisation and display framework for time-cost-carbon emissions in building materialisation phase based on nD BIM concept2025 · 9 citations
  4. 4Using Genetic Algorithms to Solve Construction Time-Cost Trade-Off Problems1997 · 502 citations
  5. 5Multi-objective optimisation of hot in-place recycling of asphalt pavement considering environmental impact, cost and construction quality2018 · 21 citations