Introduces a new metric for assessing safety in systems, indicating improved safety evaluation methods.
This paper introduces the De Bruijn functional Λ(T, H) as a mathematically rigorous, operator-theoretic, and kernel-based metric suitable for Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS), Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF), and Safety Integrity Level (SIL) assurance. We show that Λ(T, H) provides a localized, positive, self-adjoint quadratic form capable of quantifying unsafe deviation, fault intensity, and risk-weighted deviation. Three plant-relevant definitions of Z(t) are developed: control error, diagnostic residual, and consequence-weighted deviation. It is a similar concept as I presented in my paper (Functional Safety is Not a Snapshot: Modeling SIL(t) via Mosaic Aging and Stochastic Hazard Rates. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18705930) We demonstrate that each yields a structurally robust safety metric with clear SIL claim patterns. This is futuristic approach to functional safety
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Usman Zafar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: