PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society1 citations

Efficiency Pitfalls of Explainable AI in Clinical Diagnostic and Treatment Human-AI Workflows

View Full Paper
THTim HunsickerASAndré SchulzRLRobert Andreas Leist

Key Points

  • This research investigates how explanations from AI influence diagnostic efficiency and accuracy in ophthalmology workflows.
  • Conducted a between-subjects experiment involving 32 ophthalmologists diagnosing diabetic retinopathy with and without AI explanations.
  • Utilized qualitative methods, including interviews and think-aloud protocols, with 11 clinicians to understand their experiences with AI in treatment workflows.
  • AI explanations did not enhance diagnostic accuracy but increased decision-making time, leading to reduced efficiency.
  • Clinicians perceived explanations as less useful and disruptive, especially in routine cases, confirming findings from the qualitative analysis.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate how AI-provided explanations impact efficiency, diagnostic accuracy, user perceptions, and workflow integration in ophthalmologists' clinical diagnostic and treatment workflows, this study explores the challenges in human-AI interaction with transparency features in time-sensitive environments.BackgroundWhile explainable AI (XAI) aims to foster trust and understanding, its introduction into complex work domains can unintentionally increase cognitive load and disrupt workflows, especially in high-stakes medical settings, potentially impairing system performance.MethodThe multi-phase, mixed-methods study included two parts. Study 1 (N = 32) was a between-subjects experiment in which ophthalmologists diagnosed diabetic retinopathy with AI support, with or without visual explanations (e.g., highlighting lesions). Measures included diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic time, trust, and usefulness. Study 2 (N = 11) employed qualitative methods, including think-aloud protocols and interviews, to explore clinicians' experiences with AI in daily (treatment) workflows.ResultsIn Study 1, explanations did not improve accuracy but increased decision time, reducing efficiency. Trends suggested lower perceived usefulness and trust in the explanation condition. Qualitative data from Study 2 supported these findings; clinicians found explanations time-consuming and disruptive, questioning their practical value, especially for routine cases.ConclusionA critical trade-off exists between pursuing AI transparency and the operational demand for efficiency. Explanations, while well-intentioned, can function as efficiency pitfalls in time-pressured clinical practice, highlighting the boundary conditions and challenges in designing effective human-AI systems.ApplicationThese insights inform future AI system design, favoring adaptable, on-demand explanations tailored to user needs. Such a user-centric approach supports complex cases without impeding routine task efficiency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hunsicker et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9baa885696592c86ecb5fhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261443764
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1When Explanations Differ: A Qualitative Study of Clinical Views on Explainable AI (XAI) Methods in Healthcare (Preprint)2025
  2. 2EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE: FROM ALGORITHMIC TRANSPARENCY TO TRUST AND SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE2026
  3. 3"Bridging Accuracy AND Transparency: Explainable Ai IN Healthcare -A Review"2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4AI Assistance in Medical Decision-Making: The Role of Recommendations and Explanations in Simulated Clinical Cases2026
  5. 5Transparency and Explainability in Human Factors — A Systematic Review of Usability Assessment Practices for AI Medical Devices2026