This analysis shows that a patient-initiated follow-up pathway reduces service pressures in neurogastroenterology.
Objective Neurogastroenterology disorders, including disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), are among the most encountered conditions in gastroenterology clinics, associated with high healthcare utilisation, compounding service and waiting list pressures. We implemented a patient-initiated follow-up pathway (PIFU) for selected patients at a neurogastroenterology clinic to understand if this was an effective and efficient way of managing waiting lists. Design In a tertiary setting with access to a multidisciplinary team, stable patients with neurogastroenterology disorders and DGBI were added to a time-limited PIFU on the understanding they would not receive routine clinic follow-up; instead, PIFU activation would trigger an appointment within ≤6 weeks. We evaluated outcomes of patients managed on PIFU between August 2021 and May 2025. Results 177 neurogastroenterology patients (mean age 50.3 years) were managed on a PIFU pathway after integrated care and a mean 3.7±2.3 tertiary appointments. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (102/177, 57.6%) was the most common condition managed on PIFU (p=0.006) and 46/177 (26%) had DGBI overlap. After a mean of 475±SD 224.4 days on PIFU, only 11.3% (n=20/177) activated PIFU resulting in an estimated saving of £58 507 and 395 routine appointments. Compared with non-activators, there were no differences in patient characteristics except that PIFU activators were more likely to have DGBI overlap (p=0.02) and IBS activators were more likely to be antispasmodic non-responders (p=0.02). Conclusion PIFU can be used effectively in selected patients with DGBI responsive to first-line and second-line treatment. Routine follow-up should be reserved for more complex, refractory patients with more comorbidities and DGBI overlap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clare et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: