Why the study?
Lp(a) is an accepted cardiovascular risk factor, but final proof of causality awaits a randomized trial of Lp(a) lowering.
Does lowering Lp(a) with RNA therapeutics like pelacarsen reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Does lowering Lp(a) with RNA therapeutics like pelacarsen reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RNA therapeutics such as pelacarsen potently lower Lp(a) levels by 80%, setting the stage for ongoing phase 3 trials to definitively test the Lp(a) hypothesis for cardiovascular risk reduction.
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has risen to the level of an accepted cardiovascular disease risk factor, but final proof of causality awaits a randomized trial of Lp(a) lowering. Inhibiting apolipoprotein(a) production in the hepatocyte with ribonucleic acid therapeutics has emerged as an elegant and effective solution to reduce plasma Lp(a) levels. Phase 2 clinical trials have shown that the antisense oligonucleotide pelacarsen reduced mean Lp(a) levels by 80%, allowing 98% of subjects to reach on-treatment levels of <125 nmol/l (∼50 mg/dl). The phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON (Assessing the Impact of Lipoprotein(a) Lowering With TQJ230 on Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With CVD) outcomes trial is currently enrolling approximately 7,680 patients with history of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease and controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to pelacarsen versus placebo. The co-primary endpoints are major adverse cardiovascular events in subjects with Lp(a) >70 mg/dl and >90 mg/dl, in which either of the two being positive will lead to a successful trial. Additional ribonucleic acid-targeted therapies to lower Lp(a) are in preclinical and clinical development. The testing of the Lp(a) hypothesis will provide proof whether Lp(a)-mediated risk can be abolished by potent Lp(a) lowering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsimikas et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease with elevated Lipoprotein(a). Pelacarsen vs. Placebo was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: