Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Testbed evaluates C/N0 in GNSS receivers, demonstrating reliable performance across various scenarios.
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) provide essential position, velocity, and time (PVT) information worldwide. Accurate evaluation of GNSS signals and receiver performance requires realistic simulation environments, particularly for the carrier-to-noise-density ratio (C/N0), a critical indicator reflecting signal quality dependent on satellite elevation angles. This paper presents the development of a GNSS testbed specifically designed to simulate and estimate C/N0 values, focusing on GPS L1 C/A signals. The proposed testbed comprises three main components, a satellite simulator that controls signal power accurately according to satellite elevation angles, an up-/down-converter for RF/IF band conversion, and a signal receiver that estimates C/N0 using the Narrowband–Wideband Power Ratio (NWPR) method. The performance of the proposed testbed was evaluated under four scenarios, namely static, dynamic, jamming, and real-signal. In the static scenario, the proposed system achieved a maximum C/N0 estimation RMSE of 0.60 dB-Hz for satellites with elevation angles above 30° and 1.63 dB-Hz for those below 30°. In the dynamic scenario, the corresponding RMSE values were 0.68 dB-Hz and 0.86 dB-Hz, whereas under jamming conditions they increased to 2.08 dB-Hz and 2.12 dB-Hz, respectively. Furthermore, in the real-signal scenario, the C/N0 values estimated by the proposed testbed exhibited trends consistent with those reported by a commercial u-blox receiver processing the same live-sky signals, thereby confirming its reliability under actual GNSS reception conditions. These results demonstrate that the proposed GNSS testbed enables reliable C/N0 simulation and estimation for GNSS receiver performance evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
황용택 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: