Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical exploration reveals confounding bias in variance-maximizing methods, suggesting improvements for shock identification.
This paper examines the vulnerability of variance-maximizing identification, specifically the Max-Share estimator, to biases arising from confounding shocks. We show analytically that Max-Share tends to recover a hybrid of structural disturbances rather than the dominant long-run shock of interest, even when the target shock clearly drives low-frequency variation. To address this weakness, we propose a band-limited frequency-domain estimator – the Limited-Spectral approach – which isolates low-frequency dynamics and reduces contamination from higher-frequency shocks. Using a transparent two-shock model, we characterize the confounding mechanism and document its implications through Monte Carlo experiments. We further show that, while Limited-Spectral improves identification of low-frequency shocks, variance maximization in the spectral domain can still face difficulties at business-cycle frequencies when multiple structural shocks overlap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dieppe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: