This framework demonstrates enhanced communication reliability in disaster-resilient cities, suggesting improved emergency response capabilities.
In today’s densely populated and technology-driven smart cities, natural and human-made disasters increasingly threaten the resilience of communication infrastructures, creating critical challenges for maintaining reliable connectivity. The failure of conventional networks during crises significantly hampers emergency response, coordination, and information dissemination. To address these challenges, this paper presents Weighted Average Algorithm-based Clustering and Routing (WAA-CR), a novel, secure, and adaptive UAV-based framework for disaster response and recovery. WAA-CR integrates three key components: shelters or Ground Control Stations (GCSs) as communication anchors and support hubs, survivable clustering and routing using a WAA-based metaheuristic optimizer, and secure and trustworthy drone communication enabled by a lightweight trust evaluation mechanism, and authentication model. The framework formulates a multi-objective optimization model that simultaneously minimizes the number of active UAVs and routing cost, while maximizing trust, communication reliability, and coverage. Cluster head (CH) election and routing decisions are guided by a composite fitness function that considers residual energy, link stability, mobility, and dynamic trust scores. Additionally, an adaptive maintenance mechanism enables dynamic reconfiguration to handle CH failures, trust degradation, or mobility-driven topology changes. Extensive simulations conducted in MATLAB R2020ademonstrate that WAA-CR significantly outperforms existing baseline FANET protocols in terms of energy efficiency, cluster stability, trust accuracy, and end-to-end delivery performance. These results validate the proposed framework’s effectiveness in building resilient, scalable, and secure UAV-based communication networks for post-disaster environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alwasel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: