Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates ABCB1 polymorphisms and their association with epilepsy in a Jordanian cohort, suggesting potential genetic influences.
Background: Epilepsy is a chronic disorder with a higher prevalence in low- and middle-income countries. ATP-binding cassette superfamily B1 (ABCB1) not only has a potential influence on the resistance to antiepileptic drugs but also plays a possible role in the occurrence of epilepsy. Purpose: To evaluate the association of ABCB1 polymorphisms, c.1236C>T (rs1128503), c.2677G>T (rs2032582), and c.3435C>T (rs1045642), with epilepsy susceptibility in a Jordanian cohort. Subjects and methods: Eighty-six cases of patients with epilepsy were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for ABCB1 c.1236C>T, c.2677G>T, and c.3435C>T gene variants. The proportions of genotypes and alleles in the epilepsy group were compared with one hundred healthy controls who were previously also analyzed by PCR. Results: The C alleles of the ABCB1 polymorphisms c.1236C>T and c.3435C>T were more prevalent in the epilepsy group than in controls. The patients with epilepsy were less likely to have the TT genotype compared with controls (concerning ABCB1 c.1236C>T) (ORTT vs. CC = 0.42; 95% CI = [0.19–0.91]; p = 0.019). The CC genotype of ABCB1 c.3435C>T was more frequent in epileptics than healthy people (ORCC vs. TT = 4.3; 95% CI = [1.8–9.95]; p = 0.0007). No significant difference in ABCB1 c.2677G>T allelic and genotypic frequencies was observed between epileptic cases and healthy volunteers. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that ABCB1 c.1236C>T and c.3435C>T variants were associated with epilepsy susceptibility in this Jordanian cohort, whereas no significant association was observed for c.2677G>T. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the modest sample size and require validation in larger, independent studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abduljabbar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: