PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Invariant Compression (IC): A Method for Structural Context Transfer Across Heterogeneous LLMs

View Full Paper
YPYuliia Poliakova

Key Points

  • The central aim is to develop a method for transferring structured context across heterogeneous large language models without shared memory.
  • Introducing Invariant Compression (IC) to create invariant representations.
  • Utilizing Reverse Brick analysis for probing across independent models.
  • Iterative refinement of context transfer through empirical observations.
  • Models decompose invariant structures, revealing domains of applicability and conditions for degradation.
  • Identified gaps in reconstruction highlight shifts to prior-driven completion.
  • Introduced regime-conditioned invariants that depend on competing completion pressures.

Abstract

This preprint introduces Invariant Compression (IC), a method for transferring structured context across large language models (LLMs) without shared memory. IC transforms interaction into invariant representations (Brick, Seed, Transferable Core) that preserve structural constraints while minimizing token overhead. These artifacts are probed across independent models using Reverse Brick analysis, enabling reconstruction, constraint extraction, and iterative refinement. Empirical observations show that models do not merely reconstruct content, but decompose invariant structures into applicability domains, degradation conditions, and missing boundary definitions. These gaps mark points where reconstruction shifts from invariant-based reasoning to prior-driven completion. The work introduces the concept of regime-conditioned invariants, where invariant stability depends on competing completion pressures rather than binary preservation. IC is positioned as a structural transfer mechanism, complementary to governance frameworks such as Domain Beacons, which define operational scope. Together, they address key failure modes in agentic systems: structural drift and unauthorized action. This work is conceptual and qualitative, based on cross-model testing without shared state. Cross-model agreement is treated as a signal, not as proof. This work was developed through iterative, structured interaction with multiple large language models as part of the methodological process. This version includes an author-provided Ukrainian translation of the preprint for broader accessibility. The Ukrainian version includes minor clarifications and refinements of the method.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yuliia Poliakova (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0a2e553a5433e34b4596https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19697404
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1From Compression to Expression: A Layerwise Analysis of In-Context Learning2025
  2. 2Validity Mirage: Context Compression Failure Modes in LLMs2025
  3. 3In-Context Learning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4IN-CONTEXT LEARNING AS GENERAL-PURPOSE LEARNING: A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY AND NEW PERSPECTIVES2025
  5. 5Representation_Invariance2026