Systematic review assesses educational measurement improvements via emerging technologies, suggesting a need for better alignment in methods.
Emerging technologies (ETs), such as AI and reality techniques, are reshaping educational measurement. However, existing studies remain dispersed and are rarely synthesized in ways that clarify how ETs participate in the evidentiary work of educational measurement. Guided by PRISMA 2020, we systematically reviewed 933 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2025 in formal educational settings. We coded studies by (a) grain size (micro, meso, macro), (b) Constructing Measures Theory building blocks (construct map, item design, outcome space, measurement model), and (c) ET category. Results showed a strong concentration at the micro level (88.88%) and in outcome space and measurement model work (86.80% combined), indicating that ET-enabled innovation has focused primarily on transforming performances into indicators and modeling those indicators for interpretation and decision-making. Learning analytics and educational data mining, machine learning and deep learning, and automated scoring and feedback systems were the dominant ET clusters. These findings point to an uneven development of ET-enabled educational measurement. Included studies also indicating recurring concerns about transparency, fairness, and governance are linked to the field’s main areas of ET-enabled concentration. We therefore argue for closer alignment among construct claims, evidence, modeling, and intended use, and offer implications for developers, researchers, and education practitioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: