Haptophytes are ubiquitous single-celled eukaryotic plankton in coastal and open oceans that play a key role in marine biogeochemical cycling. Understanding the size structure and community composition of active haptophytes is crucial for elucidating their diversity and ecological functions. This study investigated the diversity and community structure of pico- (0.2–3 μm) and nano-sized (3–20 μm) haptophytes in the surface waters of the western Pacific Ocean using high-throughput sequencing targeting the hypervariable V4 region of the 18S rRNA. The pico-sized community exhibited significantly higher diversity than the nano-sized community. Community composition varied significantly between size fractions, driven primarily by the genera Chrysochromulina and Syracosphaera. Furthermore, the nano-sized community was more strongly influenced by environmental variables than the pico-sized community, although neither size fraction displayed a clear coastal-to-open-ocean distribution pattern. Null and neutral community model analyses indicated that both size-fractionated communities were primarily regulated by stochastic processes, while deterministic processes exerted a greater influence on the nano-sized community. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed stronger interconnections and a higher number of keystone species within the nano-sized community. In both networks, intermediate taxa (relative abundances of 0.01% to 0.1%) exhibited the highest diversity and abundance among keystone species, highlighting their pivotal role in shaping the network structure and stability. Additionally, phylogenetic analyses revealed that while the majority of ZOTUs clustered with known taxa, multiple deep-branching, uncultured lineages were identified across both size fractions, indicating substantial uncharacterized genetic diversity. This study underscores the variability and hidden diversity of size-fractionated haptophyte community structures in oligotrophic open oceans, providing valuable insights into their functional significance in global biogeochemical cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: