Multi-country analysis shows clinical effectiveness of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in ESBL-producing infections, highlighting potential treatment strategies.
Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) has demonstrated activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) and provides a carbapenem-sparing option. Broader use of C/T alongside other carbapenem/inhibitor combinations may expand therapeutic choices and reduce selection pressure for carbapenem resistance, supporting antimicrobial stewardship and limiting the spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Methods: SPECTRA was a multicenter, retrospective real-world study of hospitalized adults (≥18 years) who received ≥48 h of C/T across seven countries (Australia, Austria, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Spain, and the UK) from January 2016 to November 2020. Medical-record data were collected for up to 6 months before treatment and 30 days after the final C/T dose (or until death). This sub-analysis describes clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in patients with laboratory-confirmed ESBL-E (n = 39). Results: Thirty-nine ESBL-E patients were included (mean age 59.3 years; 56.4% male); 79.5% had ≥1 comorbidity (mean 2.2 per patient). Common pathogens were Escherichia coli (n = 23) and Klebsiella spp. (n = 12). Investigator-assessed clinical success was 64.9%, microbial eradication was 27.0%, in-hospital mortality was 20.5%, and 30-day readmission was 5.1%. ICU admission during the index hospitalization occurred for 38.5% of patients (mean ICU stay: 16.0 days). The median treatment duration was 11 days while the mean hospital stay after C/T initiation was 13.5 days. Conclusions: In this real-world multi-country cohort, C/T showed clinical effectiveness in ESBL-E infections, with outcomes consistent with the overall SPECTRA population. C/T offers a carbapenem-sparing strategy that broadens treatment options and may help reduce reliance on carbapenems, supporting efforts to limit carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. The findings warrant evaluation in larger and comparative studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yucel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: