Experimental investigation reveals bond degradation in GFRP adhesive anchors in concrete due to wetting-drying cycles, indicating durability concerns.
The long-term durability of adhesive anchors in aggressive environments is a critical concern for infrastructure safety, with steel corrosion being one of the most detrimental phenomena. While glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) anchors offer corrosion-resistant alternatives to steel anchors in harsh marine environments, the bond performance at the anchorage interface progressively deteriorates under wetting–drying (WD) cycles, which may compromise long-term anchorage integrity. However, the bond characteristics of GFRP anchors under WD exposure, particularly the development of predictive models, remain insufficiently understood. This paper presents an experimental investigation into the impact of WD cycles on the bond of GFRP adhesive anchors in concrete. Twenty-four specimens were tested under pull-out loads, considering two key variables: bonded length (40 mm and 80 mm, corresponding to 5 and 10 times the bar diameter) and number of WD cycles (0, 30, 60, and 90). Artificial seawater was prepared via ASTM D1141-98 to simulate marine exposure conditions. The results revealed that both bond strength and bond stiffness decreased significantly with increasing WD cycles, while the failure mode progressively shifted from the bar–adhesive interface to the adhesive–concrete interface. Based on the experimental data, a cycle-dependent bond strength model was developed to predict the bond degradation of the anchor–concrete interface after WD exposure. Requiring only the undegraded concrete strength, the proposed model effectively captures the coupled effects of WD cycles and bonded length on bond strength degradation, presenting a practical tool for the durability design and service life evaluation of GFRP anchorage systems in coastal and marine environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: