Controlled incubation reveals how initial SOC influences carbon responses from fresh-straw input, suggesting management strategies for soil carbon.
Soil organic carbon (SOC) responses to straw return are strongly influenced by active carbon dynamics and extracellular enzyme responses, yet how these processes vary with initial SOC status and long-term straw-return history remains unclear. To address this question, we conducted a controlled incubation experiment using soils from long-term straw removal (CK) and straw return (SR) plots at two sites with contrasting SOC levels: a carbon-poor fluvo-aquic soil in Quzhou (QZ) and a carbon-rich black soil in Gongzhuling (GZL). Three fresh-straw input levels were imposed, and CO2 release, SOC, labile C and N pools, extracellular enzyme activities, and ecoenzymatic stoichiometry were determined. Fresh-straw input markedly stimulated carbon mineralization in both soils, but SOC responses differed substantially. In QZ, SOC increased 12.1–15.7% at day 7 (vs. T0) and remained 6.7–12.1% above the control at day 90 under the long-term straw-return background. In contrast, GZL showed only minor early SOC responses, and doubled straw input reduced SOC 4.9–9.5% at day 90 despite a stronger dissolved organic carbon (DOC) pulse and greater cumulative CO2 release. Enzyme responses also differed between soils: higher straw input in QZ enhanced β-cellobiohydrolase (CBH), β-xylosidase (BX), and especially L-leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), accompanied by lower ecoenzymatic C:P and higher vector angle, whereas GZL showed later activation of CBH, BX, and NAG with only slight changes in vector angle. Overall, our results indicate that initial SOC status and long-term straw-return history jointly regulate whether fresh-straw input promotes net SOC accumulation or enhanced mineralization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: