This analysis reveals distinct performance ratios of convex and concave defined-outcome ETFs during market fluctuations, suggesting optimal conditions for each.
This article is the second in a two-part series introducing a new type of defined-outcome ETF with a convex payoff profile. These ETFs are designed to offer improved performance during significant market drawdowns and recoveries compared to existing defined-outcome ETFs with a concave payoff profile. In this article, we further analyze the downside-to-upside trade-off of convex and concave defined-outcome ETFs using the downside-to-upside performance ratio. Our historical analysis shows that both concave and convex defined-outcome ETFs exhibit similar downside-to-upside performance ratios. However, concave defined-outcome ETFs offer a superior trade-off during moderate market drawdowns and recoveries, while convex defined-outcome ETFs provide a better trade-off during deep market drawdowns and recoveries. These differences stem from their distinct payoff profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding Liu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: