The Variable Cycle Engine (VCE) is a key enabling technology for addressing the economic and environmental challenges of next-generation supersonic civil aircraft. This paper presents a multidisciplinary design analysis and optimization (MDAO) approach to quantitatively assess the potential benefits of Variable Cycle Engines (VCE) in the conceptual design of supersonic civil aircraft. In this approach, component-level models of a conventional Mixed-Flow Turbofan (MFTF) and a double-bypass VCE with a Core Driven Fan Stage (CDFS) are integrated into the MDAO process. Employing a multi-point optimization strategy, the engine design parameters and off-design control schedules are first determined. Subsequently, for each given engine design (MFTF and CDFS VCE), the airframe geometry parameters are optimized to minimize the aircraft Maximum Take-off Weight (MTOW). The application of this approach is illustrated through a case study of a medium-sized supersonic civil transport. The results indicate that, under the assumption of identical weights for the VCE and the MFTF, the design with the VCE reduces the MTOW by 2.8%, block fuel consumption by 5.7%, and total mission Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) emissions by 24.2% compared to the design with the MFTF. Additionally, lateral noise and flyover noise during the take-off phase are decreased by 2.2 EPNdB and 1.9 EPNdB, respectively. To account for the potential weight increase caused by the structural complexity of the VCE, a parametric weight sensitivity analysis is conducted. Results show that the VCE retains its advantages in MTOW, fuel efficiency, noise, and emissions for weight penalty factors up to 1.15.
Yang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: