A systematic review and meta-analysis assesses muscular endurance in youth, highlighting the test's limitations.
This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized the evidence on the reliability and validity of the 90° push-up test (90-PSU) test for assessing muscular endurance in children and adolescents. Four databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus) were searched from inception to March 2026 following PRISMA guidelines. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and nine provided data for meta-analysis (16 subgroups; n = 884). The pooled results indicated high test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.909; 95% CI: 0.842–0.948), although substantial heterogeneity was observed (I 2 = 91.93%). Evidence regarding inter-rater and absolute reliability was scarce and inconsistent. Seven studies evaluated validity, but only one examined criterion validity against one-repetition maximum bench press, reporting a low association. Although the 90-PSU test shows high relative reliability, limited evidence on validity and measurement error restricts its interpretability and sensitivity to change in youth populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carballo-Afonso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: