Examines adaptive scheduling strategies in ports, highlighting improved efficiency and resilience.
Port scheduling systems face critical challenges from escalating disruptions and the limitations of traditional optimization, including rigid feasibility checks, opaque decision-making, and the absence of learning mechanisms. This paper introduces the generative adaptive resilience (GAR) framework, an integrated approach that advances port scheduling from static constraint satisfaction toward a dynamic, learning-enabled process. The GAR integrates generative AI (GAI), mathematical optimization, and evolutionary learning into a closed loop, enabling ports to respond to disruptions and proactively prepare for them. The framework bridges large language models (LLMs) with operations research through the Feasibility-Aware Constrained Decoding (FACD), converting human-interpretable actions (e.g., redirect, delay, resequencing) into mathematically feasible scheduling adjustments with a feasibility guarantee. The GAR explicitly models and exploits synergistic action pairs (e.g., jointly delaying a feeder vessel while redirecting a deep-sea liner), thereby achieving cost reductions through coordination coefficients. Empirical validation using Ningbo Port data shows that the GAR achieves faster policy convergence, reduced high-priority vessel delays, and faster solution time than full-resilience baselines, while maintaining equivalent redundancy. The framework maintains safe collaborative action rates and reduces peak terminal utilization. These results demonstrate the GAR’s concrete advantages: accelerated adaptation, quantifiable service improvements, and computational efficiency, providing ports with a measurable pathway from reactive operations to adaptive, learning-enabled resilience, contributing to risk and safety science in the AI Era. • A framework of GAI and a mathematical program for adaptive port resilience. • Constrained decoding enables the Large Language Model to create schedule actions. • Explicitly optimize peak utilization to prevent terminal overload and delay. • Validated on Ningbo Port data: faster convergence, lower delays, higher synergy. • Enable multi-port and privacy-preserving transportation resilience evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: