Bibliometric analysis reveals key contributors and themes in Canadian surgical research, highlighting its significance.
The most productive countries, provinces, institutions, authors, and topics were identified. CJS remains an important part of Canadian surgical discourse through its continued dissemination of quality research across Canada and beyond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robertson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: