PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

SMART for Childcare: Protecting Young Children from Mold Exposure After Hurricanes and Flooding in North Carolina

JRJulia RuthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillJBJulia BassUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillSPS PatelUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate policy options to protect young children from mold exposure following disasters in North Carolina.
  • Comparative policy analysis framework used to assess four policy options
  • Options evaluated included the status quo, cash assistance, mold education program, and State Mold Assessment Team
  • Factors assessed included cost, impact, equity, and political feasibility
  • Direct cash assistance and education provide limited benefits
  • Establishing SMART shows strong political feasibility and a moderate cost
  • SMART has a high impact in communities most at risk for mold exposure

Abstract

The increased frequency and severity of hurricanes and flooding in North Carolina have heightened the public health risk of indoor mold exposure for young children, particularly those under ages zero to five. Evidence links post-disaster mold exposure to short- and long-term respiratory consequences, including respiratory illness and asthma development. Existing policies in North Carolina rely on reactive post-disaster efforts, but lack the coordination and standardization needed to protect vulnerable populations. This paper evaluates four potential policy options, including the status quo, direct cash assistance for low-income families, a childcare mold education certification program, and the creation of a State Mold Assessment and Remediation Team (SMART). Using a comparative policy analysis framework, options were assessed on cost, impact, equity, and political feasibility. Results indicate that while cash assistance and education programs offer targeted but limited benefits, establishing SMART provides strong political feasibility, moderate cost to the state, and high impact in communities most at risk. 

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ruth et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5a4488ba6daa22dabc8ahttps://doi.org/10.17615/y1s7-2f45
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper