Review discusses therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Child-Pugh B patients, suggesting new strategies.
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and moderate liver dysfunction (Child–Pugh class B) represent a large yet understudied population. These patients are frequently excluded from clinical trials, leading to a paucity of evidence regarding optimal management. The Child–Pugh score, although historically central for therapeutic decision-making, has major limitations due to interrelated and subjective parameters. The introduction of objective indices such as the albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) grade has improved functional assessment and allowed a more refined stratification within the heterogeneous CP-B group. This review summarizes and critically discusses current data on locoregional and systemic treatments for HCC in CP-B patients. Available evidence suggests that transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) may be feasible in carefully selected and well-compensated CP-B7 patients, particularly those with ALBI grade 1– 2 and controlled portal hypertension, with median overall survival ranging approximately from 12 to 16 months. In contrast, patients with CP-B8/B9 liver function experience significantly higher rates of hepatic decompensation and derive limited survival benefit from locoregional interventions. Similarly, systemic therapies may be considered in selected CP-B7 patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain an option for patients ineligible for immunotherapy or as sequential therapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors, though benefits are modest and toxicity frequent in CP-B8/9. The integration of dynamic liver function monitoring and more objective tools may pave the way toward more personalized therapeutic strategies. Dedicated clinical trials focusing on CP-B HCC are urgently needed to optimize treatment selection, sequencing, dosing, and safety in this fragile but growing patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Decraecker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: