PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Brain and Spine0 citationsOpen Access

Upright Supine Imaging Can Detect Clinically Relevant Occult Instability in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis - A Two-Year PROM Based Comparison with Flexion Extension Radiographs

View Full Paper
TFTom FolkertsJWJulia WimmerLSLukas Schönnagel

Key Points

  • To evaluate if upright-supine imaging (USI) provides better prognostic information than flexion-extension radiographs (FER) for predicting outcomes in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
  • Retrospective analysis of 92 patients undergoing decompression-only surgery for DLS.
  • Assessment of instability using ΔRT from FER and USI with multivariable regression for two-year outcomes.
  • ROC analysis determined optimal ΔRT thresholds for predicting improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and low back pain (LBP).
  • ΔRT_USI independently predicted postoperative improvement in ODI (p<0.001) and LBP (p<0.001).
  • A ΔRT_USI threshold of 7.9% was optimal for predicting outcomes (ODI: AUC=0.87; LBP: AUC=0.62).
  • USI identified instability in 22.8% of patients that FER missed, leading to less postoperative improvement (p<0.001).

Abstract

Flexion-extension radiographs (FER) are widely used to assess segmental instability in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and guide surgical decision-making, as dynamic instability may be associated with suboptimal outcomes after decompression only. However, FER rely on patient effort, and pain or limited mobility can reduce reproducibility and underestimate instability. Upright-supine imaging (USI), comparing upright radiographs with supine MRI, may better capture slip dynamics, but its clinical value remains undefined. To evaluate whether USI-derived segmental instability provides additional prognostic information beyond FER for predicting postoperative improvement in disability and low back pain (LBP) following decompression-only surgery for DLS. This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included 92 DLS patients undergoing decompression-only surgery. Slip dynamics were quantified as between-position difference in relative translation (ΔRT) on FER and USI. Multivariable regression assessed associations between ΔRT and two-year outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index ODI, LBP numeric rating scale). ROC analyses determined optimal ΔRTUSI cutoffs. ΔRTUSI independently predicted postoperative improvement in ODI (p<0. 001) and LBP (p<0. 001), whereas ΔRTFER was not associated with outcomes. ROC analysis identified a ΔRTUSI threshold of 7. 9% as optimal (ODI: AUC=0. 87, sensitivity=0. 86, specificity=0. 81; LBP: AUC=0. 62, sensitivity=0. 9, specificity=0. 48). USI identified instability in 22. 8% of patients, uncovering occult instability that FER missed. USI-unstable patients showed significantly less postoperative improvement (p<0. 001). USI detects clinically relevant occult instability missed by FER and independently predicts outcomes after decompression-only surgery. A ΔRTUSI threshold of approximately 8% serves as a quantitative marker supporting USI for preoperative assessment in DLS. • ΔRTUSI predicted 2-year ODI and LBP improvement after decompression-only. • ΔRTFER was not associated with postoperative outcomes. • USI revealed instability missed by FER in 22. 8% of patients. • A 8% ΔRTUSI cutoff identified patients at risk for inferior improvement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Folkerts et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5a8888ba6daa22dac056https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2026.106064
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper