PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Developmental Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

The dynamics of fraction processing in preadolescents and adults: Evidence from reaching behavior.

View Full Paper
CEChristopher D. ErbJMJeff MoherAOAnna O'Connor

Key Points

  • This research investigates how preadolescents and adults process fractions during a magnitude comparison task, focusing on their cognitive strategies.
  • Participants included 30 preadolescents (ages 10-12) and 30 young adults (ages 18-22) assessed using three-dimensional hand tracking.
  • Fraction magnitude comparison tasks were performed to study global magnitude representations and component-magnitude congruency effects.
  • Movement times were analyzed to compare responses between age groups.
  • Preadolescents showed a significantly larger component-magnitude congruency effect than adults, indicating different processing strategies.
  • The distance effect for large magnitude fractions was also significantly greater in preadolescents compared to adults.
  • Results suggest that age-related improvements in fraction processing are associated with enhanced inhibitory control.

Abstract

Fraction processing presents an important test case for investigating the development of numerical cognition, as fraction proficiency in elementary school is a unique predictor of later mathematical achievement. Building on previous mouse-tracking research investigating the dynamics of fraction processing in adults, we used three-dimensional hand tracking to assess the dynamics of fraction processing in preadolescents (n = 30, 10-12 years of age) and young adults (n = 30, 18-22 years of age) performing a fraction magnitude comparison task. Preadolescents and adults showed limited evidence of global magnitude representations of fractions featuring congruent components and magnitudes (e.g., fractions like 1/3 and 1/4 in which the size of the components and the magnitudes of the fractions cued the same "small" response). However, clear evidence of global magnitude representations was observed on trials featuring incongruent components and magnitudes (e.g., fractions like 2/3 and 3/4 in which the size of the components cued a "small" response, but the magnitudes of the fraction cued a "large" response). The component-magnitude congruency effect observed in movement times was significantly larger in preadolescents than in adults, and the distance effect used to identify global magnitude representations was significantly larger in large magnitude fractions for preadolescents than for adults. Taken together, these results suggest that age-related changes in fraction processing reflect improved inhibitory control. More generally, our results challenge recent dual-process models of fraction processing, with performance more parsimoniously accounted for by differences in strategy rather than the involvement of distinct processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Erb et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5ac988ba6daa22dac612https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002173
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Magnitude processing distinguishes fraction comparison strategy profiles in adolescents2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Nonsymbolic ratio and fraction magnitude processing predict fraction knowledge in early grades.2026
  3. 3Differential predictors of complex fraction approximation and exact calculation in young adults2026
  4. 4Individual differences modulate the neural correlates of fraction processing in primary-school children in South Africa2024
  5. 5A study of notation dependence in fraction magnitude processing using event related potentials2025