Comparative legal analysis addresses sexual autonomy protections and consent in Japan and Italy, implying key legal challenges.
This paper examines the protection of patients' sexual autonomy in medical settings through a comparative analysis of Japanese and Italian criminal law. Taking the 2023 reform of the Japanese Penal Code and the so-called 'Breast Surgeon Case' as its starting point, the study investigates how each legal system addresses non-consensual sexual conduct by medical professionals. The analysis reveals that Japan's typological approach and Italy's principled approach each face distinct challenges related to the principle of legality (lex certa), particularly regarding the clarity and predictability of criminal provisions governing sexual offences in medical contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiroki Suga (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: