Key result
Definite phenotypic DLCN diagnosis strongly predicts FH mutation with over a 400-fold higher odds.
Why the study?
Familial hypercholesterolaemia is ideally diagnosed by genetic testing, but such testing is not universally available, necessitating assessment of mutation frequency and predictors in the general population.
What is the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia-causing mutations in the general population and what are the best clinical predictors?
Observational (n=98,098)
What is the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia-causing mutations in the general population and what are the best clinical predictors?
Familial hypercholesterolaemia-causing mutations are more common than previously thought (1:217) and can be effectively identified using DLCN criteria or an LDL-C threshold >4.4 mmol/L.
Supports using a simple LDL-C threshold for genetic screening referrals; leaves open whether this population-.
AIMS: Ideally, familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is diagnosed by testing for mutations that decrease the catabolism of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; however, genetic testing is not universally available. The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency and predictors of FH causing mutations in 98 098 participants from the general population, the Copenhagen General Population Study. METHODS AND RESULTS: We genotyped for LDLR[W23X;W66G;W556S] and APOB[R3500Q] accounting for 38.7% of pathogenic FH mutations in Copenhagen. Clinical FH assessment excluded mutation information. The prevalence of the four FH mutations was 0.18% (1:565), suggesting a total prevalence of FH mutations of 0.46% (1:217). Using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria, odds ratios for an FH mutation were 439 (95% CI: 170-1 138) for definite FH, 90 (53-152) for probable FH, and 18 (13-25) for possible FH vs. unlikely FH. Using the Simon Broome criteria, the odds ratio was 27 (20-36) for possible vs. unlikely FH, and using the Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Death (MEDPED) criteria, 40 (28-58) for probable vs. unlikely FH. Odds ratios for an FH mutation were 17 (9-31) for LDL-cholesterol of 4-4.9 mmol/L, 69 (37-126) for LDL-cholesterol of 5-5.9 mmol/L, 132 (66-263) for LDL-cholesterol of 6-6.9 mmol/L, 264 (109-637) for LDL-cholesterol of 7-7.9 mmol/L, and 320 (129-798) for LDL-cholesterol above 7.9 mmol/L vs. LDL-cholesterol below 4 mmol/L. The most optimal threshold for LDL-cholesterol concentration to discriminate between mutation carriers and non-carriers was 4.4 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: Familial hypercholesterolaemia-causing mutations are estimated to occur in 1:217 in the general population and are best identified by a definite or probable phenotypic diagnosis of FH based on the DLCN criteria or an LDL-cholesterol above 4.4 mmol/L.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benn et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Familial hypercholesterolaemia (n=98,098). Definite familial hypercholesterolaemia by DLCN criteria vs. Unlikely familial hypercholesterolaemia was evaluated on Presence of an FH mutation (OR 439, 95% CI 170-1138). A definite phenotypic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia by DLCN criteria strongly predicted the presence of an FH mutation (OR 439; 95% CI 170-1138).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: