PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology133 citationsOpen Access

Relationship of Daily Step Counts to All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events

NSNiels A. StensEBEsmée A. BakkerAMAsier Mañas

Key Result

Daily step counts as low as 2,517 steps/d significantly reduced all-cause mortality (aHR 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-0.999) compared to 2,000 steps/d, with optimal risk reduction at 8,763 steps/d (aHR 0.40).

Key Points

  • The study aimed to quantify the relationships between daily step counts and the risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 111,309 individuals.
  • Analyzed step count metrics and health outcomes using generalized least squares and random-effects models.
  • Assessed variations in risk reductions based on device used and wear location.
  • Observed significant risk reduction for all-cause mortality at 2,517 steps/day (aHR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84-0.999).
  • Noted significant risk reduction for incident cardiovascular disease at 2,735 steps/day (aHR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.999).
  • Optimal step counts associated with maximum health benefits were approximately 8,763 for mortality and 7,126 for cardiovascular events.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=111,309)

Structured PICO

Do higher daily step counts reduce all-cause mortality and incident cardiovascular disease in the general population?

P
Population
111,309 individuals from 12 studies in the general population
I
Intervention
Objectively measured daily step counts
C
Comparator
2,000 steps/d (reference)
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD)hard clinical

As few as ~2,600-2,800 steps per day yield significant mortality and CVD benefits, with progressive risk reductions up to ~8,800 and ~7,200 steps per day, respectively.

Main Result

Effect estimate: aHR 0.92 (95% CI 0.84-0.999)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The minimal and optimal daily step counts for health improvements remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: A meta-analysis was performed to quantify dose-response associations of objectively measured step count metrics in the general population. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). Study results were analyzed using generalized least squares and random-effects models. RESULTS: In total, 111,309 individuals from 12 studies were included. Significant risk reductions were observed at 2,517 steps/d for all-cause mortality (adjusted HR aHR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84-0.999) and 2,735 steps/d for incident CVD (aHR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.999) compared with 2,000 steps/d (reference). Additional steps resulted in nonlinear risk reductions of all-cause mortality and incident CVD with an optimal dose at 8,763 (aHR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.38-0.43) and 7,126 steps/d (aHR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.45-0.55), respectively. Increments from a low to an intermediate or a high cadence were independently associated with risk reductions of all-cause mortality. Sex did not influence the dose-response associations, but after stratification for assessment device and wear location, pronounced risk reductions were observed for hip-worn accelerometers compared with pedometers and wrist-worn accelerometers. CONCLUSIONS: As few as about 2,600 and about 2,800 steps/d yield significant mortality and CVD benefits, with progressive risk reductions up to about 8,800 and about 7,200 steps/d, respectively. Additional mortality benefits were found at a moderate to high vs a low step cadence. These findings can extend contemporary physical activity prescriptions given the easy-to-understand concept of step count. (Dose-Response Relationship Between Daily Step Count and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses; CRD42021244747).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stens et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in General population (n=111,309). Daily step counts vs. 2,000 steps/d was evaluated on All-cause mortality (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-0.999). Daily step counts as low as 2,517 steps/d significantly reduced all-cause mortality (aHR 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-0.999) compared to 2,000 steps/d, with optimal risk reduction at 8,763 steps/d (aHR 0.40).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ecdb67eb2c6328dba62ce2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.07.029
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper