PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Kansas Journal of Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Investigating the Effect of Albumin Administration on the BDG (1,3-β-D-glucan) Serum Assay

CHChelsea HuerterWichita State UniversityEHEmily HughesWichita State UniversityMAMonica AhrensUniversity of Kansas Medical Center

Key Points

  • This study examines the association between the timing of albumin administration and false-positive results in the BDG serum assay for invasive fungal infections.
  • Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 4,599 electronic health records from 2010 to 2020
  • Inclusion of patients ≥18 years with BDG serum assay performed
  • Logistic regression used to analyze the association between albumin timing and false-positive results.
  • Out of 255 patients who received albumin before BDG testing, 109 (42.7%) had a positive BDG result.
  • Among positive results, 83 were false positives, leading to a false-positive rate of 76.1%.
  • The highest odds of false-positive results occurred when albumin was administered 6-8 days prior (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.51-2.91).

Abstract

Introduction. The β-D-glucan (BDG) serum assay is a screening tool used in the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal infections (IFI). False-positive results have been reported, including in patients who have recently received intravenous albumin prior to testing. Author of this study examined the association between timing of albumin administration and BDG assay results. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4,599 electronic health records at The University of Kansas Health System (TUKHS). Patients were eligible if they were ≥18 years of age and had a BDG serum assay performed between 2010 and 2020. Demographic data, comorbidities, albumin administration, and IFI status were extracted and recorded in REDCap, a HIPAA-compliant database. The final analytic cohort included 2,061 patients. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between time from albumin administration to BDG testing and false-positive results. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.5.2. Results. A total of 255 patients received albumin within two weeks prior to BDG testing, of whom 109 (42.7%) had a positive BDG result. Among these positive results, 83 were classified as false positives (false-positive rate: 76.1%). Logistic regression demonstrated the highest odds of a false-positive result when albumin was administered 6-8 days prior to testing (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.51-2.91). Conclusions. Albumin administration within days preceding BDG testing may be associated with an increased risk of false-positive results, potentially leading to unnecessary diagnostic evaluation and treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huerter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edaa9b4a46254e215b3133https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol19.25388
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper