PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience0 citationsOpen Access

Improving functioning in severe mental illness with cognitive remediation: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised multi-centre trial with adjunct sham-controlled tDCS (HEADDSET+)

NBNienke Catharina BuistAPAnika PoppeBĆBranislava Ćurĉić‐Blake

Key Points

  • This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive remediation in enhancing cognitive and functional outcomes in individuals with severe mental illness.
  • Pragmatic randomized multi-centre trial involving 126 participants with severe mental illness.
  • Participants will undergo 16–20 weeks of twice-weekly cognitive remediation sessions with either active or sham tDCS.
  • Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-waitlist, post-treatment, and at 6-month follow-up.
  • Improvements in daily functioning and cognition are hypothesized; outcomes will be compared between CR vs. waitlist and CR + active tDCS vs. CR + sham tDCS.
  • Meta-cognitive skills and subjective experiences will also be assessed post-treatment.

Abstract

Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) face daily challenges, often due to cognitive impairments. While cognitive remediation (CR) can improve both cognitive and functional outcomes, especially when combined with other rehabilitation interventions, its effectiveness in individuals with SMI requiring sheltered housing remains unclear. This trial primarily investigates whether CR improves daily and cognitive functioning compared to a waitlist period. As a second exploratory aim, we will examine whether adding transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances the effectiveness of CR in a randomised sham-controlled comparison. Lastly, the trial examines participants’ subjective experiences of the CR intervention. We hypothesise improvements in goal attainment, daily functioning, and cognition. Using a non-concurrent multiple baseline design, 126 participants (aged 18–65) with SMI residing in sheltered housing facilities will receive 16–20 weeks of twice-weekly CR sessions lasting 30–45 min, combined with either active (N = 63) or sham tDCS (N = 63). Functional, cognitive, and clinical assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-waitlist, post-treatment, and 6-month follow-up. Additionally, participants’ meta-cognitive skills and subjective experiences will be evaluated post-treatment. In multilevel mixed models, we will evaluate the effect of CR (combining both CR groups) vs. waitlist, and compare CR + active tDCS vs. CR + sham tDCS to explore potential augmentation effects. If effective, integrating CR, with or without tDCS, into standard care may benefit recovery in individuals with SMI requiring long-term support. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06378463, registered on April 17, 2024.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buist et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edab424a46254e215b35eehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-026-02245-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cognitive remediation therapy for anorexia nervosa: Current evidence and future research directions2013 · 161 citations
  2. 2Natural Course of Schizophrenic Disorders: A 15-Year Followup of a Dutch Incidence Cohort1998 · 648 citations
  3. 3The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates1982 · 2,961 citations
  4. 4How to evaluate metacognitive functioning in psychotherapy? The metacognition assessment scale and its applications2003 · 606 citations
  5. 5Feasibility and acceptability of combining cognitive remediation and tDCS in long-term psychiatric clinical care2025 · 4 citations