Why the study?
AMI and AS frequently coexist in older adults and may confer high mortality, but contemporary, sex-specific population trends in joint AMI-AS deaths are not well defined.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mortality from concurrent acute myocardial infarction and aortic stenosis has steadily declined over two decades in the US, with steeper relative declines in women.
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and aortic stenosis (AS) frequently coexist in older adults and may confer particularly high mortality, yet contemporary, sex-specific population trends in joint AMI-AS deaths are not well defined.Understanding these trends may inform prevention, structural heart interventions, and post-AMI care pathways in patients with valvular disease.Methods: Mortality data were obtained from the US Multiple Cause of Death files (1999-2023) for decedents aged 25 years with AMI (ICD-10 I21.x) and AS (I35.0) both listed as causes of death, stratified by sex.Age-adjusted mortality rates per 100,000 population were calculated using the 2000 US standard population, and temporal trends were modeled with log-linear joinpoint regression to estimate average annual percent change (AAPC).Results: Over 1999-2023, age-adjusted AMI+AS mortality declined from 1.09 to 0.54 per 100,000 in women and from 1.62 to 0.99 per 100,000 in men.Joinpoint regression identified a constant downward trajectory with AAPC -2.76% in females and -2.06% in males (both p<0.05), with absolute rates remaining higher in men and residual burden concentrated in those 75 years.Conclusions: Mortality in which AMI and AS co-occur on the death certificate has fallen steadily for more than two decades in both sexes, with a steeper relative decline in women.These findings suggest that advances in AMI management, valve therapies, and risk-factor control have translated into population-level mortality gains, but older adults, particularly men, remain a high-risk group requiring targeted preventive and structural heart-disease strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: