Abstract To develop and evaluate the German versions of the Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scales for type 1 (DSAS-1) and type 2 diabetes (DSAS-2). The questionnaires were translated using a standardized translation and back-translation procedure. Adults with type 1 (N=636) and type 2 diabetes (N=177) completed the DSAS-1 and DSAS-2 via an online panel. Factor analyses, internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), and correlations with convergent measures and discriminant constructs were conducted to assess reliability and validity. For the DSAS-1, the expected three-factor structure was confirmed; for the DSAS-2, a two-factor solution emerged, although a forced three-factor analysis supported the original structure with minor cross-loadings. Scale consistencies were excellent (DSAS-1: 0.94, DSAS-2: 0.95, and subscales: 0.86–0.93). Both scales showed good concurrent, convergent and discriminant validity. The DSAS-2 showed stronger associations with weight self-stigma and self-esteem than the DSAS-1, consistent with its focus on internalized stigma. Three in four persons (type 1 diabetes: 74% and type 2 diabetes: 72%) endorsed at least one stigma item, mostly related to “blame and judgement.” Diabetes stigma constitutes an important psychosocial problem. The German DSAS-1and DSAS-2 are reliable, valid instruments for assessing diabetes stigma. Blame and judgement appeared as the most common form of stigma experienced in this sample.
Klinker et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: